Document Type

Article

Publication Date

Spring 1-14-2026

Abstract

This paper conducts a comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese frameworks for AI literacy and adoption, with focus on agentic AI and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems capable of autonomous reasoning and execution. We examine national policies, educational integration, governance structures, and technological roadmaps, employing both qualitative review and quantitative modeling. Mathematical formulations include multi-dimensional literacy scoring, Bass diffusion models for adoption dynamics, risk assessment functions, regulatory effectiveness indices, competitiveness metrics, and optimization frameworks for resource allocation. Our analysis reveals divergent paradigms: the U.S. Favors decentralized, innovation-driven approaches with emphasis on interoperability and public-private collaboration; while China pursues centralized, state-led strategies with comprehensive content labeling and rapid systemic integration. As both have their strength and weakness, we propose a hybrid governance architecture that synthesizes strengths from both models, supported by algorithmic implementations and sensitivity analyses. We have used recent publications (2021-2025), where we identify trends, challenges, and implication styles. The paper concludes with quantitative and algorithmic recommendations for policymakers, educators, and industry stakeholders navigating the evolving landscape of global AI competition

Program or Discipline Name

Management, Entrepreneurship, and Business Administration

Secondary Program or Discipline Name

Computer and Information Sciences

Publication Title

International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering and Management

Start Page No.

1

End Page No.

14

ISSN

2350-0557

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2026.13.1.1

Share

COinS